Assess Veterans’ Perceptions, Attitudes, Intention to Use, and Experiences Prior to and After Exposure to an Automated Shuttle. Open Access

Autonomous shuttles offer significant health and societal benefits to individuals lacking adequate transportation access. However, limited information exists regarding Veterans’ experiences with autonomous vehicle (AV) technology. This study uses a convergent mixed methods design to obtain Veterans’ perceptions before and after exposure to an automated shuttle (AS) in Gainesville, Florida. Phase 1 involves survey administration to obtain pre- and post-exposure perceptions of AV, while Phase 2 uses focus groups to delve deeper into post-exposure perceptions and experiences with the AS. Through data triangulation, survey and focus group data will be merged to inform policies in Florida and the Department of Veterans Affairs, facilitating the effective implementation of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology. Veterans’ perceptions of AVs were assessed using the AV User Perception Survey (AVUPS), comprising 28 visual analogue scale items across four domains: Intention to Use, Perceived Barriers, Perceived Well-being, and Acceptance. The focus group questionnaire explored Veterans’ perceptions about AVs prior to their shuttle ride and how these changed afterwards. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare Veterans’ perceptions, and a directed content analysis was used to analyze the focus groups. The study involved 23 Veterans, with 10 of them participating in focus groups. AVUPS data indicated a significant increase in Intention to Use (p = .002) and Acceptance (p = .004), with a decrease in Perceived Barriers (p = .007). Initial findings from the qualitative phase revealed that Veterans had an overall positive experience with the AS, but also making recommendations for improved acceptance, particularly the shuttle’s slow speed and general safety. This study plays a critical role in facilitating the development of future interventions aimed at reintegrating mobility-challenged Veterans, who either cannot drive or face transportation limitations, back into society.

References

Classen, S., Mason, J., Hwangbo, S. W., Wersal, J., Rogers, J., & Sisiopiku, V. (2021). Older drivers’ experience with automated vehicle technology. Journal of Transport & Health, 22, 101107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2021.101107

Mason, J., Classen, S., Wersal, J., & Sisiopiku, V. P. (2020). Establishing face and content validity of a survey to assess users’ perceptions of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Record, 2674(9), 538–547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120930225

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Classen, S., Sisiopiku, V., Mason, J. R., Stetten, N. E., Hwangbo, S. W., Kwan, J., & Yang W. Barriers and facilitators of people with and without disabilities before and after autonomous shuttle exposure. Future Transportation. 2023; 3(2):791–807. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp3020045